Honor Magic5 Ultimate vs Huawei Mate50 Pro: Geekbench 6 Benchmark Comparison
This article will compare the performance of two devices from Honor and Huawei based on their benchmark scores in Geekbench 6.
Let’s compare the Honor Magic5 Ultimate and the Huawei Mate50 Pro smartphones and find the smartphone which offers the best performance.
Honor Magic5 Ultimate vs Huawei Mate50 Pro
Based on the Geekbench 6 listing the Honor Magic5 Ultimate has scored a single-core score of 1460 points and a multi-core score of 4658 points. Compared to this, the Huawei Mate50 Pro only has a single-core score of 1243 points and a multi-core score of 4070 points.
Hello a benchmark comparison with Geekbench 6 between the Huawei Mate50 Pro (Pic 1,3) and the Honor Magic5 Ultimate (Pic 2,4). The devices are in Normal Mode, no with Performance setting.@geekbench #honormagic5ultimate #huaweimate50Pro #benchmark #Honor #Huawei #Snapdragon pic.twitter.com/8wXYOfBZpW
— Fabrizio Degni (@sev7en2507) March 25, 2023
Now about the CPUs, both smartphones have chipsets with a primary clock speed of 3.19GHz, however, there is a difference in the core configuration of the two chipsets.
The chipset used in Huawei’s Mate50 Pro smartphone has an architecture of 1+3+4 cores and the primary core as mentioned has a clock speed of 3.19GHz. Three of its cores are clocked at 2.75GHz and the other four are clocked at 2.02GHz.
In comparison to this, the chipset used in the Honor Magic5 Ultimate smartphone has a better core configuration with its primary core clocked at 3.19GHz, four of its cores clocked at 2.80GHz, and the last three clocked at 2.02GHz.
The Honor Magic5 Ultimate also operates on the Android 13 operating system and has a RAM of 16GB while the Huawei Mate50 Pro runs on the previous Android 12 operating system with a lesser RAM of only 8GB.
So from the comparison, it is very clear that the Honor Magic5 Ultimate offers the best performance when compared with the Huawei Mate50 Pro smartphone.
Here’s more about the two devices
General
| Release Date | 20 March 2023 | 28 September 2022 |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm | 162.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm |
| Weight | 217 gm | 209 gm |
Connectivity
| Network Connectivity | 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G | 2G, 3G and 4G |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e with Dual Band Support and Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 with Dual Band Support and Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | Version 5.2 | Version 5.2 |
Processor
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm) Chipset |
| Primary Clock Speed | 3.19 GHz | 3.19 GHz |
| Operating System | Android 13 based MagicOS 7.1 | Android 12 based EMUI 13
Android 12 based HarmonyOS 3.0 (in China) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 730 |
Display
| Display Type | LTPO OLED Display | OLED Display |
| Screen Size | 6.81” | 6.74” |
| Screen Resolution | 1312 x 2848 pixels | 1212 x 2616 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 50MP + 50MP + 50MP Triple Camera Setup | 50MP + 64MP + 13MP Triple Camera Setup |
| Front Camera | 12MP | 13MP |
Sensors
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Under Display, Ultrasonic Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Under Display, Optical Fingerprint Sensor |
| Face ID | Yes | Yes |
| Accelerometer | Yes | Yes |
| Proximity Sensor | Yes | Yes |
| Gyroscope | Yes | Yes |
| Barometer | No | Yes |
| Compass | Yes | Yes |
| Color Spectrum | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband Support | Yes | No |
Battery
| Battery Capacity | 5450 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Fast Charge | 66W Wired Fast Charge
50W Wireless Fast Charge Reverse Wireless Fast Charge 5W Reverse Wired Fast Charge |
66W Wired Fast Charge
50W Wireless Fast Charge 5W Reverse Wireless Charge |
