Vivo X Flip vs OPPO Find N2 Flip Vs Moto Razr 40 Ultra Vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4: Spec Comparison
With more and more brands making their own foldable devices, now the market is filled with foldable devices offering different specs and features and trying to be one better than the other. This article is a comparison between four flip devices from four of the leading smartphone brands.
Let’s compare the Vivo X Flip, OPPO Find N2 Flip, Moto Razr 40 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 smartphones and find which among them is the best.
Vivo X Flip vs OPPO Find N2 Flip Vs Moto Razr 40 Ultra Vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4
General
| Dimensions | Unfolded – 166.4 x 75.3 x 7.8 mm
Folded – 86.4 x 75.3 x 16.6 mm |
Unfolded – 166.2 x 75.2 x 7.5 mm
Folded – 85.5 x 75.2 x 16 mm |
Unfolded – 170.8 x 74 x 7 mm
Folded – 88.4 x 74 x 15.1 mm |
Unfolded – 165.2 x 71.9 x 6.9 mm
Folded – 84.9 x 71.9 x 15.9-17.1 mm |
| Weight | 198 gm | 191 gm | 184.5 or 188.5 gm | 187 gm |
Connectivity
| Network Connectivity | 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G | 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G | 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G | 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 with Dual Band Support and Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 with Triple Band Support | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e with Dual Band or Triple Band Support Depending on Region | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 with Dual Band Support and Wi-Fi Direct |
| Bluetooth | Version 5.3 | Version 5.3 | Version 5.3 | Version 5.2 |
Processor
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Chipset |
| Primary Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz | 3.2 GHz | 3.19 GHz | 3.19 GHz |
| Operating System | Android 13 based OriginOS 3 | Android 13 based ColorOS 13 | Android 13 | Android 12(which can now be upgraded to Android 13) based One UI 5.1 |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
Storage
| Storage Options | 12GB/256GB and 12GB/512GB | 8GB/256GB, 12GB/256GB and 16GB/512GB | 8GB/256GB, 12GB/256GB, 12GB/512GB | 8GB/128GB, 8GB/256GB and 8GB/512GB |
Display
| Display Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED Display
Cover Display – AMOLED Display |
Foldable LTPO AMOLED Display
Cover Display – AMOLED Display |
Foldable LTPO AMOLED Display
Cover Display – AMOLED |
Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X Display
Cover Display – Super AMOLED |
| Screen Size | 6.74”
Cover Display – 3” |
6.8”
Cover Display – 3.26” |
6.9”
Cover Display – 3.6” |
6.7”
Cover Display – 1.9” |
| Screen Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels
Cover Display – 422 x 682 pixels |
1080 x 2520 pixels
Cover Display – 382 x 720 pixels |
1080 x 2640 pixels
Cover Display – 1056 x 1066 pixels |
1080 x 2640 pixels
Cover Display – 260 x 512 pixels |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz | 165Hz
Cover Display – 144Hz |
120Hz |
Camera
| Rear Camera | 50MP + 12MP Dual Camera Setup | 50MP + 8MP Dual Camera Setup | 12MP + 13MP Dual Camera Setup | 12MP + 12MP Dual Camera Setup |
| Front Camera | 32MP | 32MP | 32MP | 10MP |
Sensors
| Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor | Yes, Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor |
| Accelerometer | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Proximity Sensor | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Gyroscope | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Barometer | No | No | Yes(US Only) | Yes |
| Compass | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Colour Spectrum | No | Yes | No | No |
Battery
| Battery Backup | 4400 mAh | 4300 mAh | 3800 mAh | 3700 mAh |
| Fast Charge | 44W Wired Fast Charging Feature | 44W Wired Fast Charging Feature | 30W Wired Fast Charging Feature
5W Wireless Charging Feature |
25W Wired Fast Charging Feature
15W Wireless Fast Charging Feature 4.5W Reverse Wireless Charging Feature |
Colours
| Colour Variants | Rhombic Purple, Silk Gold and Diamond Black | Astral Black, Moonlit Purple and Gold | Infinite Black, Glacier Blue and Viva Magenta | Bora Purple, Graphite, Pink Gold, Blue, Yellow, White, Navy, Khaki and Red |
All four smartphones in comparison are great smartphones but when you look at the overall specifications of the smartphones, the Vivo X Flip has turned out to be the better one.
Looking at the performance of the Vivo X Flip, we can’t say that the device offers the best performance but we can sure say that the device offers good performance which is comparable with the other three devices. Just to mention, among the four devices, the OPPO Find N2 Flip has the best performance.
Coming to its display too, the device doesn’t have the best display but, offers its users quite a large display for its inner display and cover display. It should also be noted that the Vivo smartphone has the highest screen resolution for its inner display among the four devices. The Motorola smartphone has the largest display with the fastest screen resolution.
For its cameras, the Vivo X Flip has a dual camera setup at its rear, just like the other three devices and offers its users a 50MP main camera and a 12MP ultrawide camera. Apart from the OPPO smartphone, the Vivo smartphone is the only device with a 50MP main camera. The latest Motorola Razr Ultra however has a slightly better ultrawide camera of 13MP. For selfies, the Vivo smartphone also has a 32MP front-facing camera, which is again the best camera and is also being offered in the OPPO device and the Motorola smartphone.
Regarding the battery backup, the Vivo X Flip has the best battery backup of 4800 mAh with a wired fast charge support of 44W. However, the device lacks a wireless charging feature and a reverse charging feature, both of which are present in Samsung’s flip-phone. It is also to be noted that the Motorola smartphone also supports a wireless charging feature.
So as mentioned, in terms of its performance, displays, cameras and battery, even if the smartphone is not the best in some aspects, the device when it comes to its overall specification is comparatively better than the other three devices and this makes the Vivo X Flip the best smartphone in this comparison.
