Google has strongly responded to the U.S. Department of Justice’s recent proposal that could force the tech giant to sell its Chrome browser, calling it a “staggering” and “radical interventionist agenda” that exceeds the scope of the original antitrust case.
Following Judge Amit Mehta’s August ruling that found Google’s search market practices monopolistic, the DOJ proposed several far-reaching remedies. Chrome, which holds 61% of the U.S. browser market, is central to Google’s ecosystem.
Google’s response characterizes the DOJ’s proposal as “staggering” and exceeding the original case scope. The company argues that forcing Chrome’s sale would endanger user security and privacy, while mandatory search query sharing with external entities could compromise user data.
Key concerns raised by Google include:
- Potential impact on Mozilla Firefox’s business model
- Restrictions on Google Search access
- Implementation of mandatory choice screens on Pixel phones
- Creation of a “Technical Committee” with broad oversight powers
- Possible limitations on AI development investments
The proposal’s reach extends beyond the initial focus on search distribution agreements with Apple, Mozilla, smartphone manufacturers, and carriers. Google claims this represents “unprecedented government overreach” that could harm consumers, developers, and small businesses.
The case, which began under the Trump administration and continues under Biden, is the most significant tech antitrust action since Microsoft’s case. Google plans to present its counter-proposals next month, with further proceedings expected in 2025.
